 | | Re: Significance of stud orientation
|
|
(...) Yes, I think it would be worth making these changes. However, I don't imagine that parts will be rejected from the library because their stud-orientation is bad. I know real-world stud-logos are more uniform than they were in the (distant) (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts and question about metal parts
|
|
(...) I don't understand what the functional difference is for those parts? (...) As I (currently) understand it, LEGO generally doesn't create their electric stuff, they contract it out -- so there wouldn't be a LEGO part number for the metal bits. (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Crazy, OK Heretical Idea ...
|
|
Geez, it'd be nice if I finished my thought... (...) If the renderer allowed the user to change the include/search path from the default: ldraw\parts;ldraw\p to ldraw\parts.ldl;ldra...dl;ldraw\p The renderer would pick up the translated parts first. (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Primitives with different BFC winding
|
|
(...) Different winding should not be a big deal. The BFC standard requires renders to keep track of the winding direction and cull correctly. Steve (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Crazy, OK Heretical Idea ...
|
|
Quoting out of the original order: (...) Flaming? Well, you should go research LDraw II, now that Jacob's server is back online. (...) How do these formats do with the number of triangles normally found in an LDraw model? My impression is that these (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
