 | | Re: L3pao/Lgeo problems
|
|
(...) The L3P readme states that you must add the +L<lgeopath> switch, where <lgeopath> is the Lgeo directory, to the render settings. If you are using POV-Ray 3.5 then just type the switch into the text box next to the resolution settings box. If (...) (22 years ago, 24-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | L3pao/Lgeo problems
|
|
- When render a model including Technic liftarms 1x11.5 double bent using Lgeo parts, 2 additionnal holes are generated (see (URL) left half is rendered with lgeo, right half without) - And I have a problem with Lgeo path too: while L3pao correctly (...) (22 years ago, 24-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it important the difference of these parts?
|
|
(...) Great that's what I wanted to know. Where did you get that information? (...) (22 years ago, 24-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels and axles [DAT]
|
|
(...) The axle (with the extension) (The normal axle is 35b.dat) 0 ~Wheel Axle Metal with extension 0 Name: xxxx.dat 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp 1 16 0 0 18 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 12 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 10 4 0 0 0 0 4 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L-Calc Request
|
|
(...) Orion, Please email me with the details of what you mean, and an example of what you think it would look like. ... without digging out my text books, I do not know what you want. Thanks, Paul (22 years ago, 24-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it important the difference of these parts?
|
|
(...) Apart different resistance to pressure, these 3 parts are also in the library for better coverage of lego history: 4085a is years 1981-1984 4085b is years 1985-199x 4085c is years 199x-2002 Having all variants allows to better convey nostalgy (...) (22 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Wheels and axles
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Niels Karsdorp wrote: [snip!] (...) I couldn't figure out for what you need a part number. Then I couldn't figure out the grammatically proper way to word the previous sentence. Anyway, what part is it that you need a number for? Can (...) (22 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC Ceritfied Parts Question
|
|
(...) Usually, but not always. (...) The key is that in BFC-land, the important part of the relation between the parent file and the subfile is whether or not the parent wants to invert the subfile. If the subfile has an obvious orientation (...) (22 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it important the difference of these parts?
|
|
(...) The difference may or may not be important in the CAD world, but when it comes to construction there is a world of difference. The c variant is noticably stronger than either a or b if the clip is frequently "exercised". For example on any of (...) (22 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC Utility Inconsistencies [DAT]
|
|
The invisible faces cannot be seen in many other parts, so I think it's a primitive. Here's the 3001.dat I'm using: 0 Brick 2 x 4 0 Name: 3001.dat 0 Author: James Jessiman 0 Original LDraw Part 0 LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2002-03 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 (...) (22 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
