Special:
|
[DAT] (requires LDraw-compatible viewer)
|
Subject:
|
Re: BFC Utility Inconsistencies
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:31:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
713 times
|
| |
|
|
The invisible faces cannot be seen in many other parts, so I think it's a
primitive.
Here's the 3001.dat I'm using:
0 Brick 2 x 4
0 Name: 3001.dat
0 Author: James Jessiman
0 Original LDraw Part
0 LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2002-03
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 2002-05-07 KJM BFC Certification
1 16 20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat
1 16 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat
1 16 -20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat
0 BFC INVERTNEXT
1 16 0 24 0 36 0 0 0 -20 0 0 0 16 box5.dat
4 16 40 24 20 36 24 16 -36 24 16 -40 24 20
4 16 -40 24 20 -36 24 16 -36 24 -16 -40 24 -20
4 16 -40 24 -20 -36 24 -16 36 24 -16 40 24 -20
4 16 40 24 -20 36 24 -16 36 24 16 40 24 20
1 16 0 24 0 40 0 0 0 -24 0 0 0 20 box5.dat
1 16 30 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat
1 16 10 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat
1 16 -10 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat
1 16 -30 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat
1 16 30 0 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat
1 16 10 0 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat
1 16 -10 0 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat
1 16 -30 0 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat
0
Thomas Foote's BFCTool is available for download at this web address:
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/tomfoote3/BIM/id97.htm
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kyle McDonald writes:
> I personally edited 3001.dat to be BFC compliant. I'd be interested
> if it's not done correctly.
>
> If you have a Parts libray as of at least this past spring, I
> would think you'd have the 3001.dat that I 'fixed'... Well I think
> it got approved around then anyway.
>
> It should say something like:
>
> 0 2002-05-10 KJM BFC Certification
>
> Near the top of the file.
>
> It also should have a line like:
>
> 0 BFC CERTIFY
>
> near the top.
>
> I've never actually heard of BFCTool. Is it available for Download
> from LDraw.org? I'd like to check it out.
>
> -Kyle
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: BFC Utility Inconsistencies
|
| I personally edited 3001.dat to be BFC compliant. I'd be interested if it's not done correctly. If you have a Parts libray as of at least this past spring, I would think you'd have the 3001.dat that I 'fixed'... Well I think it got approved around (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
