To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / *25550 (-10)
  Minifig Helmet Conquistador  [DAT]
 
Anyone know the part number of this? Andy 0 Minifig Helmet Conquistador 0 Name: px44.dat 0 Author: Andrew Westrate 0 Unofficial Part 0 CMDLINE -C0 0 KEYWORDS Imperial Armada, Spanish Main 0 BFC CW 0 Feather Hole 2 24 -3 -9.5 7 -3.3044 -8.75 8.5308 (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Aspect ratio (via L3P)
 
rmelkert wrote... (...) Yes, I would place the #include where the lights would have been. (...) No. (...) Yes, but it may be convenient to have separate files for different purposes. /Lars (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
 
  Re: Aspect ratio (via L3P)
 
Andrew Westrate wrote... (...) Nice looking camera. And good idea with a cameraman. Your camera has a lens angle of 44 degrees and an aspect ratio of 3/2. How should L3P extract that information? Perhaps by putting the pyramid into a subfile, then (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
 
  Re: PT Author question
 
(...) Generally, I'd let the author of the fix handle it. But yeah, fixes to fixes are ok. (...) If you've tried to contact the author without a response, then it's ok to fix an official part. Steve (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Classic Space Flag
 
(...) The only set that had this part was 6970 Beta-1 Command Base. I looked up the instructions for this set on Brickshelf and the flag seems to be completely missing from the instructions. I would surmise, based on other sets from the same time, (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Classic Space Flag
 
See: (URL) this part exist as a decorated/patterned element? Or was the flag-pattern strictly a sticker? Steve (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.space)
 
  PT Author question
 
This is actually a double question: 1. For parts on the PT that are fixes of existing parts, it's it considered okay to upload a new version of the part, fixing any errors or hold vote comments that my exist? 2. What about for original parts if the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Minifig glasses
 
(...) There seems to be a syntax error in the file you uploaded. - No glasses. :-( Play well, Jacob -- Jacob's LEGO aircraft: (URL) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas, lugnet.cad.dat.models)
 
  Re: PT Suggestion
 
"Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GyICs1.3o2@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) be (...) It's more complicated to program, but wouldn't it be an idea to show the next part that is similar to the one you've just looked at? Eg. you (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: PT Suggestion
 
(...) I've been thinking more about this, I'm not sure what a good "next" would be. The current (URL) queue page> works on sort of the current data. Posting a review upsets that sort, so it's hard to say "give me the next file after the one I just (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR