 | | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
A general animation group would be very nice, especaliy for pov-ray issues. I for one know very little of pov-ray (that's the reason I started work on the program, to better control animation from outside pov-ray :) ) (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
The animation (and export) part will work at 233, but I am afread the preview will be very, very, very slow if it works at all. But I am still tweaking it, so who knows :) (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Beta testers needed
|
|
Thanks for the feedback, I am going to try to get the application ready for betatesting before 20 April. Mainproblem is I have so many idees I don't think I can put it al in the first version, if I ever want to release it :) I will begin (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Indeed! Also remember plates may be different too - (URL) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
Hello, Comments below... Travis Cobbs wrote: > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes: > >>In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tony Hafner writes: >> >>>In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes: >>> >>>>>Um... Not to stir the pot or (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Bug...
|
|
<snip> (...) OS stands for Operating System like WIndows 95, Windows 98, etc... In any case did you finally get it to work on the 95 machine? -Ahui (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) Given the fact that they have to check whether or not a given file has been mirrored, I can't see that the directionality would make a large difference. If everything used CCW, then only mirrored ones would need to be reordered (assuming the (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Bug...
|
|
(...) Thanks! You're right. Mine was downloaded at 8:45 in the morning on March 2. I got the old one. However, it (the older verision) worked perfectly fine on this (internet, win 98) computor. Maybe its the opperating system? My other one was a 95 (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Bug...
|
|
Hello John, there has been two 2.12 versions of ML-Cad. The first one was up only for a few hours and crashed for unknown reason. Maybe you caught that version. Try to re-download ML-Cad from the ML-Cad homepage and make sure it's really (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] More BFC Primitives
|
|
(...) Hey- but I never heard back about which ones you wanted me to work on. Should I do all the rings? That would solve this: (URL) the PT says to send new versions of existing official files to you instead of posting them directly. Should I (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: request for modification (Tracker)
|
|
(...) Great idea- how about color-coding the voting codes? A green "C" (or "A" if you are Steve) tells you that you've already voted. Likewise, a red "H" and yellow "N" tells you that you've Held or No-voted on the part. Votes by others all show as (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Bug...
|
|
(...) Tried the files... had none, but MlCad still crashed after I got them on the system. What are OS files?( I'm only twelve, and I don't have experience in many things) I had version 2.12. Also, my MlCad exe is 1.06 megabytes, more than yours. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | request for modification (Tracker)
|
|
Steve, I just thought of something that would be a "nice to have" feature, a modification to the Certification List page. If a person is "logged in", it would be nice if the Tracker's Certification List were to take this into account. That is, if a (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> Here is the actual measurement post: (URL) interesting result! (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Snippit from the FAQ: (URL) Robert Mufano: Brick height 9.582 mm 0.37724 in Plate height 3.194 mm 0.12575 in Stud pitch 7.985 mm 0.31437 in The following popular approximations are often used. Note that the Imperial approximations are each (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Someone, long ago, posted measurements they took which have a better basis for accuracy in my view. The memory is hazy but I think what they did was build a very long wall, ensured it was linear, and measured stud center to stud center across (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Yeah, I know. My brain slipped into "helpful" mode before I finished reading and thinking... :-P (...) Thus demonstrating the "real world" difference between a scientist and an engineer. Good luck, and keep us informed, OK? (And, what do you (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | RE: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Those are the dimensions I did use, Franklin :) However, those dimensions are NOT accurate to .001 inch. And that discrepancy apparently makes a significant difference in the connection properties of the part. --Bram Bram Lambrecht (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) These are cool as Bram! Aluminium would be cool too ;) Now all you have to do is make the classic minifig! The one we all love and know. Then contact me once you have mastered this :) Mel (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Aluminum 2x4 bricks
|
|
(...) Which is my round-about way of saying, "Your figures/calculations look OK to me"... :-/ No idea why it isn't working for you. Sorry... Franklin (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
