 | | Fixed Part: 604.dat - Window 1 x 6 x 3 Panorama [DAT]
|
|
0 Window 1 x 6 x 3 Panorama 0 Name: 604.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part Fix 1 16 40 72 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2-4edge.dat 1 16 20 72 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2-4edge.dat 1 16 0 72 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2-4edge.dat 1 16 -20 72 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 32087.dat - Train Track Cross
|
|
(...) And here I though that the LDRAW Parts GOD had stopped listen to my prayers! THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!! I can't talk about the rest of the foks but I've been waiting f-o-r-e-v-e-r for the PARTS GODS to cerate this and other track pieces. AHui (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Subfiles - Question
|
|
The the following Lugnet post and the follow-on reply. I think it gives a pretty good discussion of subparts vs. inlineing. (URL) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 30248 Helicopter skids (WAS) Re: Looking for parts
|
|
(...) OK, done. I have rotated it 90 degrees and submitted the file to the Tracker. As I don't know whether is OK or not to submit other people's parts, I added a note telling this, just to have the proceeding tried in a pilot case. /Tore (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Subfiles - Question
|
|
Hello, Can someone tell me what the criteria is to create a subpart, instead of copying the whole code and rotate it a few times? I'm creating the 32087.dat file (see previous message or goto : (URL) ) and can tear the main file into different (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 32087.dat - Train Track Cross
|
|
Hi, For the Train freeks, there's something comming up. For a preview, goto : (URL) still have some work to do, but it gives you a perview from what it's gone be. Regards, Ludo (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 30248 Helicopter skids (WAS) Re: Looking for parts
|
|
(...) The part definitely hasn't been made official yet. A quick check on the parts tracker doesn't turn up a file either. If you want to finish this and submit it, that would be Very Cool. :) Steve (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 30248 Helicopter skids (WAS) Re: Looking for parts
|
|
(...) Some bases are correctly lined up, some aren't. I agree with Steve here, it sohould be rotated. Has this part been officialed yet? I still don't have it in my Parts directory, and was just about to model it when I made a search and found it (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Reviewing Parts FAQ
|
|
Based on this FAQ, I get the notion that BFC is required not optional. Maybe a rewording is in order. Something like: What should I look for when I review a part? . . . . Check the Part for correct BFC (if the part is intended to be BFC complient) (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Temporary Parts Tracker is Closed
|
|
My temporary parts tracker is now closed. The reason why I couldn't close it or fulfill remove requests until now is problems with ftp access. I wish to thank you all for the contributions and visits. /Tore (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: FAQ for Part Reviewers
|
|
(...) I wonder. . .would it be helpful, or simply more confusing, to introduce more "levels" of reviewers? Currently a part requires two votes from regular users plus one from an admin user (which is currently just Steve Bliss, yes?). I think things (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | how to add graphic to part
|
|
Is there a faq somewhere that outlines a way (easy, I hope) to stick a graphic image onto a part? Like for a custom mini-fig? I thought I had seen one once, but now I can't find it... Thanks, James Wilson Dallas, TX (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x744.dat - Technic Gear 42 Tooth
|
|
Tore the one at (URL) fine and looks great (...) (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers...
|
|
(...) I certainly *hope* not! ;-) I was just saying, hey, we got this here situation... Any ideas on how to expedite the resolution? Thanks, Franklin (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Converter of .pov to .jpg, .bmp, or .gif
|
|
You know sometimes the easiest answers are not always the most obvious. If I had played around with POV alittle longer I would have discovered the samething. Thanks much!! Nate (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Converter of .pov to .jpg, .bmp, or .gif
|
|
(...) Easy answer is Povray. Why? The .pov files are just a scene definition, you actually have to render them with povray (or other raytracer) to be able to see the images. When you render the scene, you can then save it as a bitmap graphic. Martin (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Part numbers
|
|
(...) Thanks for reposting this, Chris. I've stuck in some comments below. (...) OK, I *totally* don't remember that. Bizarre (both my memory and the parts with two numbers). 30337.dat was just released in update 2002-01. (...) (don't remember (...) (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Requesting another plug-in for LDDesignPad
|
|
(...) Hmmm, what technique did you use to do the scaling? 0 SCALE meta-commands, or scale and then inline. I used the inliner approach. Here's how it goes in ldglite using the familiar LEDIT style commands (with the scale and inliner extensions). (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Converter of .pov to .jpg, .bmp, or .gif
|
|
Hello. Question to pose. I have looked through out this groups messages as well as the ldraw website and POV website, but haven't found the answer to my question. So here goes. Is there a converter tool out there to take a .pov file and make it into (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Requesting another plug-in for LDDesignPad
|
|
Don, I tried what you suggested and it worked in L3Lab and LDView, but MLCad doesn't seem to recognize the scaling of the primitives in the part file. --Ryan (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
