Subject:
|
Re: [Parts Tracker] Reviewing Parts FAQ
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:51:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
256 times
|
| |
|
|
Based on this FAQ, I get the notion that BFC is required not optional.
Maybe a rewording is in order. Something like:
What should I look for when I review a part?
.
.
.
.
Check the Part for correct BFC (if the part is intended to be BFC complient)
(see the 'What is this BFC?' question).
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | [Parts Tracker] Reviewing Parts FAQ
|
| I took the current information available from the Parts Tracker, and the recent discussions in this group, and put together a quick FAQ page about reviewing parts. Please let me know what you think! I will be happy to receive any and all Edits, (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
