 | | Re: A really dumb question...
|
|
(...) I disagree, Unofficial parts have been used in many of the pictures submitted for the contests. The only time I believe that they should not be accepted is if the unofficial part is not available for others to use. Clone parts should never be (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: glut conundrum
|
|
(...) Indeed, it is a very old bug, and it appears that someone ran into this more recently based on the following comment in the 0.9.5 code ... // NOTE: I dont understand the colortable stack used in translate_color() // so use the default (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: glut conundrum
|
|
(...) Thats an affirmative, however, I have two development limitations: CW-5 and MacOS 8.6, which I do not believe has been attempted with the latest source code, so this may involve a bit of effort. Ray (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: glut conundrum
|
|
(...) That may be a very old bug. I remember there was a problem with the background color way back when. You can check the logs or browse the current (and old) source at the sourceforge to compare. (URL) the 0.5 code may actually predate the CVS (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Monorail Parts
|
|
I'm planning to make a model of the Jacksonville Skyway, and I'm using monorail parts for it. I'm not good at editing parts, and I don't understand what to do with subparts. Could somebody email me or post monorail files? John Henry Kruer (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: glut conundrum
|
|
(...) Disregard please, I figured it out. I can now compile macLDGLite 0.5 with the OpenGL 1.2 SDK using CW-5. I also figured out how to supress the annoying SIOUX window, so I have a non-debug version that displays cleanly. Now to todays question.. (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: A really dumb question...
|
|
Ok, I see this as: Unofficial LDRAW Parts (dats) ok - they just have to exist as LEGO (bricks) Parts. I think a case in point is a month ago or so was a model/scene that was using the new/not yet official HORSE (dat) pieces. (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: A really dumb question...
|
|
(...) they are allowed. Dave Schuler may have been unsure of the proper interpretation of the statement he quoted, but I wasn't (at least not before your reply). It unequivocally states that unofficial parts are ok, but only if that part isn't yet (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Woman hair ?
|
|
Oooh.. ;( That's bad. ;( I really need some woman or girl minifig hair... (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 3069bps2.dat, 1x2 tile - SW Avionics (Twin-Pod Car) pattern [DAT]
|
|
I recently picked up the Twin-Pod Cloud Car set to have the new rounded slopes, so that I could encode them. This set also has a new pattern for the 1x2 tile, showing some buttons and a sensor/radar scope. I went ahead and encoded this new pattern. (...) (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
