To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 7335
7334  |  7336
Subject: 
Re: A really dumb question...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 00:50:55 GMT
Viewed: 
421 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
Dave Schuler wrote:

I'm not sure if I'm reading it right (since it's the end of a very long
week).  Are unofficial pieces allowed?

No.

Not clone.dats, of course, but how
about not-yet-canonical LDraw parts?

No. - A good reason to help verifying the quality of the
not-yet-canonical LDraw parts at:

  http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/

Then the rules need to be updated, because the sentence quoted states that
they are allowed.  Dave Schuler may have been unsure of the proper
interpretation of the statement he quoted, but I wasn't (at least not before
your reply).  It unequivocally states that unofficial parts are ok, but only
if that part isn't yet available in an official release.

--Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A really dumb question...
 
Ok, I see this as: Unofficial LDRAW Parts (dats) ok - they just have to exist as LEGO (bricks) Parts. I think a case in point is a month ago or so was a model/scene that was using the new/not yet official HORSE (dat) pieces. (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A really dumb question...
 
(...) No. (...) No. - A good reason to help verifying the quality of the not-yet-canonical LDraw parts at: (URL) well, Jacob (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR