To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 7336
7335  |  7337
Subject: 
Re: A really dumb question...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 07:37:05 GMT
Viewed: 
1094 times
  
Ok, I see this as: Unofficial LDRAW Parts (dats) ok - they just have to
exist as LEGO (bricks) Parts. I think a case in point is a month ago or so
was a model/scene that was using the new/not yet official HORSE (dat) pieces.


In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs writes:
> In lugnet.cad, Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
> > Dave Schuler wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm not sure if I'm reading it right (since it's the end of a very long
> > > week).  Are unofficial pieces allowed?
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > > Not clone.dats, of course, but how
> > > about not-yet-canonical LDraw parts?
> > 
> > No. - A good reason to help verifying the quality of the
> > not-yet-canonical LDraw parts at:
> > 
> >   http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/
> 
> Then the rules need to be updated, because the sentence quoted states that
> they are allowed.  Dave Schuler may have been unsure of the proper
> interpretation of the statement he quoted, but I wasn't (at least not before
> your reply).  It unequivocally states that unofficial parts are ok, but only
> if that part isn't yet available in an official release.
> 
> --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A really dumb question...
 
(...) they are allowed. Dave Schuler may have been unsure of the proper interpretation of the statement he quoted, but I wasn't (at least not before your reply). It unequivocally states that unofficial parts are ok, but only if that part isn't yet (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR