 | | Re: I have some questions?
|
|
(...) I c I just to work with it thx for voting. (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: I have some questions?
|
|
Currently, I vote for others which is DivX which is currently defacto new standard for high quality but low size movies. Regards, Michael "Eduardo Vazquez Harte" <eduvazhar@terra.es> wrote in message news:Gn0AGD.DEx@lugnet.com... (...) 24h (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: dome.dat (and a part authoring tool idea)
|
|
(...) Well, now that you mention it, there are a few more missing type 5 lines around the top of the upper dome and the bottom of the lower dome. I wish there were better tools around to examine the lines. I've been experimenting with some new (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAO Floor Problem
|
|
the floor should be an infinate plane, no matter how far you move the camera or model you shouldn't run out of floor. try commenting out the model with/* at the front and */ at the end. leaving the lights,camera, background, floor. render it and see (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: dome.dat - Technic Rome 6 x 6 x 5 2/3 (R2D2) [DAT]
|
|
(...) Thanks for the review. I fixed the problems you noted. Let me know if you see any other problems. Bill 0 Technic Dome 6 x 6 x 5 2/3 0 Name: dome.dat 0 Author: William J. Wood 0 Unofficial Model 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part - Panel 1 x 4 x 3 with Recycling Pattern
|
|
(...) The detail of the pattern looks excellent - great work. I do not believe the type 2 lines around the border of the pattern are necessary - type 2 lines really only serve two purposes i) to represent an edge between two non co-planar surfaces, (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAO Floor Problem
|
|
Thanks...that does the trick for the floor level. I'm still having problems with the black space across the bottom of the picture though. It's almost as if POV reaches the boundary of the floor and has nothing left to render at that point. Is there (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part - Panel 1 x 4 x 3 with Recycling Pattern [DAT]
|
|
And here is the subpart. 0 ~Panel 1 x 4 x 3 Subpart 0 Name:s\4215s.dat 0 From official Part 4215.dat 1 16 20 68 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 0 68 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 -20 68 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 0 72 0 36 0 0 0 (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part - Panel 1 x 4 x 3 with Recycling Pattern [DAT]
|
|
Hi all, here is my first patterned part. I hope the name is correct. Please let me know if not. CU /Bernd 0 Panel 1 x 4 x 3 with Recycling Pattern 0 Name: 4215P08.DAT 0 Author: Bernd Broich 0 Unofficial Part 0 Panel 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: dome.dat - Technic Rome 6 x 6 x 5 2/3 (R2D2)
|
|
(...) Lines 993 to 996 have type 2 lines with color 0 instead of color 24. You could also use some more type 5 lines where the "dome xxxx sweep" sections meet the rectangles like along the outer edges. Line 766 has one such rectangle. Otherwise, it (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New poll vote for everyone...
|
|
Hi, I did not get any good results so here another question. (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: dome.dat - Technic Rome 6 x 6 x 5 2/3 (R2D2)
|
|
Hello, (...) what (...) to (...) Tell me about it. I am just re-doing one of my UFO pattern tiles. It's a pain in the a**. I will post the new part here soon .... and the amount of time i needed for it was huge.. yes. Carsten (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part : 2039 - Lamppost 2 x 2 x 7
|
|
(...) curved staircase), which I believe also originated in Fabuland. Thanks for the feedback. Chris (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | Re: What renderer did this?
|
|
Uh, that's mine. I converted the model to lightwave and then rendered it with global illumination in a Sky dome. Each part that moves was inlined down to the primative level and then converted so each part is a single entity. For example, the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part : 2039 - Lamppost 2 x 2 x 7
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Gn0r1E.270@lugnet.com... (...) Which was actually (AFAIK) originally a Fabuland piece. Here are 2 sets from 1987 that have the piece in Red & Grey (URL) work Chris. Hooray for Fabuland. :o) (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.fabuland)
|
| |
| | creating technic chain, is there a wizard to help?
|
|
I know that things like ldraw-mode and hoser can do ribbed hoses, flex cables & tubing & so on but is there an easy way to position technic chain or track links? (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAO Floor Problem
|
|
(...) newest version, or, just for now, delete the "0" in the field labeled "Y" (I.E. leave it blank). This should tell L3PAO to automatically compute the floor level. Calvin (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Bendible Objects?
|
|
(...) Yes, that's exactly what I wanted to know. How do you go about creating eliptic tori to simulate a pully band tunnign from A to B. Thank You! Greetings, Da Byte (23 years ago, 18-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAO Floor Problem
|
|
L3PAO has a "y" value that allows you to adjust the level of the floor. Is it possible that the lowest part in your model is not at y=0? Not sure about the black space... could it be a shadow from your model? -Andy Lynch ----- Original Message ----- (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Trainposter preview
|
|
This is really cool, Jeroen! I have one question though: On the 5th row, there is a red loco with a 9 volt motor-- isn't that anachronistic? I don't recognize it as being in the 9 volt line.... -John (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
