 | | Re: LDRAW memorial image site
|
|
Is it just me, or does this sound like terrorism? "If my demands are not met....." Shame on those (relatively few) of you who insist on making our hobby and community less fun. Bryan Beckwith "soc" <reallysick_of_crap@...tmail.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: printable parts catalog
|
|
(...) Glad it works. I don't know why there are any .png's. All I did was hit the "save as web page" command in Word. To tell the truth I didn't notice, 'cause I was in a hurry at the time. If anybody notices a problem, let me know and I'll get on (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Macintosh LEGO CAD/LEGO Designer
|
|
I just wanted to chime in here. Virtual PC is a workable solution for using MLCad on a Mac. I have been using VPC 4.0 and MLCad 1.99 on a G3/400 PowerBook, and I find it useable (much better than VPC 2.1.3). It is not going to win any speed awards, (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.dacta)
|
| |
| | Re: New non-magnetic coupler design
|
|
I just wanted to say thanks for the kind words. The Technic axle is a #2 not a #3. I also considered using a 1/2-connector-peg-1/2-axle-peg piece too. I might revisit that idea when I run out of #2 axles. The steering piece thingy could be replaced (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New non-magnetic coupler design
|
|
(...) I love your truck design. I might suggest using an axle piece 1 size shorter than what is in your display, (a "2" instead of a "3", or similar) but otherwise I have no complaint. As for your other problem, I think it is the downside of running (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Modeled Tanks
|
|
I've posted some pics of Mechanzied Bricks German and Russian Tanks. (URL) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
(...) Well, if these two are created, I probably wouldn't be voting in the model-only contest. It sounds too much like work <G>. I vote for MOTM because there's nice eye-candy and it's fun. The model-only contest implies that I have to scrutinize (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back... (Clarified! )
|
|
(...) It does go rather far back, doesn't it??? That's before I ever even heard of Lugnet! (...) Yeah, that's exactly why I can't figure out what to make of all this, and why I generally don't directly participate in debates. Not because I don't (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
|
When I vote for MOTM, I consider both the rendering and the model. However, if there are enough POV gurus out there that can submit fairly good models with superb scenes, they could possibly take all votes away from people who make incredible models (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
