 | | RE: "Medifig" - New scaling for minifig parts
|
|
(...) Wow, that's creepy looking! It would work fairly well with some of my vehicle designs, however. As much as I dislike the juniorized Creator figs, I wonder if they aren't more to scale than minifigs... --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu (URL) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | "Medifig" - New scaling for minifig parts [DAT]
|
|
Hi, everyone! I've been working with LEGO's for a long time, and LDraw/MLCad for a while. Judging by some of the posts I've read, I'm not the only one dissatisfied with the overly "cute" juniorized minifigs. I do not own any of the technic figures, (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Another rev to the Explorien Logo
|
|
Steve, I took a look at it and enjoyed the work that was put into this pattern. See if you can put it on a minifig torso (after changing the light blue to light gray, of course), so that we will at least have one of the 3 Explorien torsoes. James J. (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Feature Article - Progress in the LDraw Community...
|
|
(...) I read the article and caught the mention of some kind of petition. I went to the LDMC site and couldn't find one. What's it about? The reason I ask is I thought it funny that there was a petition about something produced with volunteer (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: "33" Slope Shocker... Possible name change?
|
|
Nice response time here on my behalf :] Oops (...) Yeah, I didn't like these two either, mostly the first one. It could be confusing. (...) ARRrrgh!! Hehe, got it :] To me, either of the angle method or the rise-run methods could work, and I can (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Technics beams and plates?
|
|
Well if your useing MLcad, go to 'file' and select 'scan parts'. This will ask you if you want to add any new parts it finds to the directory. When I installed MLcad I had to do this twice before I had all the parts that were soposed to be there! (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: feedback wanted for parts 2912 & 2913
|
|
(...) Yes, a complete shortcut file should be created. A stub-file for the electrical wire has been submitted, you can use that in your shortcut. You should put the 'ferrit' (that's the electric leads, right?) in a separate file, and reference it in (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | feedback wanted for parts 2912 & 2913
|
|
Hi, I posted 4 weeks ago 2 dat files from the 9v train track power connector. The top part as 2912.dat , the bottom part as 2912.dat. pictures of those parts can be seen on my home page at the following location: (URL) select the link to these (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Technics beams and plates?
|
|
I'm trying to build my first L-draw / MLcad model, and my first step was to use a 1x10 technic beam, and since my parts list only has 1x2 and 1x14, my virtual creation stopped before it started. I'll bet there is a simple way to convert the 1x14 (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: RTM patch and mklist?
|
|
(...) Mklist.exe shouldn't need any fix. Are you sure you weren't trying to use makelist.exe? Makelist.exe is obsolete; it can only handle 1000 parts. Mklist.exe was released specifically to address the shortcomings of makelist.exe. Steve (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
