 | | New Part : Fabuland Roof Chimney [DAT]
|
|
Here it the last of four Fabuland Roof parts. All comments are welcome. Chris 0 Fabuland Roof Chimney 0 Name: x790.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial Part 0 Origin is 0 -24 20 relative to Fabuland Roof Slope 0 inside 4 16 (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part : Fabuland Roof Slope with Hole [DAT]
|
|
Here it the third of four Fabuland Roof parts. All comments are welcome. Chris 0 Fabuland Roof Slope with Chimney Hole 0 Name: x789.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial Part 0 Origin is 0 -16 0 relative to Fabuland Roof (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part : Fabuland Roof Slope without Hole [DAT]
|
|
Here it the second of four Fabuland Roof parts. All comments are welcome. Chris 0 Fabuland Roof Slope without Chimney Hole 0 Name: x788.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial Part 0 Origin is 0 -16 0 relative to Fabuland Roof (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part : Fabuland Roof Support [DAT]
|
|
Here it the first of four Fabuland Roof parts. All comments are welcome. Chris 0 Fabuland Roof Support 0 Name: x787.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial Part 4 16 16 -42.4 56 16 0 56 -16 0 56 -16 -42.4 56 2 24 16 0 56 -16 0 (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 30414: Brick 1 x 4 with 4 side studs: Has this part been done?
|
|
(...) No it has not been done but I am currently working on it. --Austin (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 30414: Brick 1 x 4 with 4 side studs: Has this part been done?
|
|
This piece comes on the UCS TIE in blue (and other sets in other colors, I believe). I can't find it on Tore's Tracker page or on Partsref. Has anyone seen a file for this? Is anyone planning on doing it? I'll probably whip up a mockup of the piece (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part - 3837 Minifig Shovel
|
|
Great work! Thanks for doing this. (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Where does a parts author go next?
|
|
(...) Unless you feel able to tackle a part that is "wanted", but not marked as "in progress". The Parts TRacker is not just a record of what has been done it should also identify target parts for authoring. (...) I believe from examination of the (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Official model repository situation
|
|
"Ryan Dennett" <rdennett@firehousemail.com> wrote in message news:G8rBuw.6Fz@lugnet.com... (...) Yeah kinda funny. Sheesh...I spent about an hour and a half in a car with you, and another hour and a half at a restaurant. ;-) (...) Very little, but (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Official model repository situation
|
|
You, know, it's funny that you asked this, Ryan, because I meant to talk to Tim about it last night, but totally forgot. On the way home I was thinking about LDraw stuff when I remembered the OMR. I was getting ready to write a message to Tim, when (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Where does a parts author go next?
|
|
"Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G8pw4o.3Aw@lugnet.com... (...) I fixed the link now...thanks. -Tim (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Where does a parts author go next?
|
|
First, I'd like to thank everyone for their helpful replies to my post. Chris Dee wrote: [snip] (...) part (...) that (...) is a (...) Ah, yes. I hadn't thought to check out the parts tracker. I looked at it just now, and due to the large number of (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Official model repository situation
|
|
"Ryan Farrington" <ryanjf@ifriendly.com> wrote in message news:002f01c0968d$95...dly.com... (...) We're working on it :-) I did discuss this with Leonardo this weekend, and that's pretty low priority right now compared to other more important things (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Official model repository situation
|
|
It's been some time since the Official Model Repository has been mentioned. What is the status of it? Regards, --Ryan (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Does any one have the DAT file for these parts
|
|
2855 Turntable 8 x 8 56 teeth top 2856 Turntable 8 x 8 56 teeth bottom --Austin (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT to AutoCAD?
|
|
(...) There exist a STL to DAT converter. As Autocad can output STL files, you can use it to produce part very quickly. I have used it to produce many part with Solidworks that also has a STL output. Check my page : (URL) for the STL to DAT (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Make-your-own differential [DAT]
|
|
Here is an idea for a giant differential. I don't know what it is good for, but it works well. I do use gears. It uses a turntable popped apart and put together flipped, with 4 stud beams between the two parts. It uses 2 24t crowns and 2 24t spur (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part - 3837 Minifig Shovel
|
|
(...) Thanks! :-) (...) You can mention it, I knew this would be the case. I was trying for a quick and easy part. (...) Think so? I'm not going to worry about it too much for now. If it does happen, I or someone can "fix" it then. (...) I like (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part - 3837 Minifig Shovel
|
|
(...) Thanks! If I actually put the "edge" line in after I had returned the part to the parts box. I looked at the shovel again and I agree, it really shouldn't be there. I will remove it and make any other changes needed then I will post it again (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part - 4790 Ship's Wheel (Pirate ship steering wheel)
|
|
(...) Thanks! (...) I thought about this, then I got the great idea that since it had a stud, I would treat it like a plate or brick part... then I never thought about it again. It wouldn't be too hard to change, Just would need to study and check (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
