 | | Re: Parts Library Posted to ldraw.org
|
|
(...) Good catch--I was making assumptions. I really wish the discussion you fired off a few months ago had gone through to completion. BUT, take a look at (URL). It plainly states that the terms around the original LDraw package: (...) The original (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Library Posted to ldraw.org
|
|
(...) How do you know that? I've never seen any formal terms of use statement for the community created part files. With this lacking, wouldn't it be natural for parts authors to assume that submitted parts follow the same terms of use as the (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: reminder: bug in piece #2500c01
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 7:23 AM Subject: Re: reminder: bug in piece #2500c01 (...) primitive? (...) I sent a fix to Terry a long time ago (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Library Posted to ldraw.org
|
|
(...) Good point. I will check into this. In the meantime, don't anyone plan anything permanent around this function. If this is a problem, it would only apply to the parts in the original LDraw file library, not to additional work done by LCadders. (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Flex-System Hose (Example MPD file)
|
|
(...) Some parts-authors have been given a set of 3-digit numbers they can use when writing parts. I didn't remember if you had one or not. (...) Hmm. Looking at the minifig-bendy-hose parts, it looks like I gave you bad advice. The relevant part (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
