To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / *11425 (-10)
  Re: BFC: LITS 2
 
(...) Actually, the problem is that their determinant is 0, neither positive nor negative. So the renderer would have to disable BFC processing for any file with this kind of reference. Another problem (that L3P handles in most cases) is that (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: BFC: LITS 2
 
(...) Oh, good. :) I wasn't sure before, but after posting a follow-up to John today, I figured it out. Now, about those transparent parts with decorations... Steve (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: BFC: LITS 2
 
(...) I think we're using different meanings here. By 'local clipping', I mean the clip-setting in a subfile disappears when that subfile is finished. It is not carried back up to the superfile, and it is not reinstated if the same subfile is used (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  LDRAW Troubles
 
I have LDRAW, downloaded from LDRAW.org, and I keep getting a runtime error 200. I downloade and ran the patch that the site has. Still doesn't work. Any advice? (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: BFC: LITS 2
 
(...) Unless we have a solution to the invert case, the document's assertion is correct. (...) I think you are correct that NOWIND/UNKNOWN is not important/needed. For now, let's proceed assuming that decorations will be handled by using NOCLIP or (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Horse Progress Report
 
(...) Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: BFC: LITS 2
 
(...) I've kept thinking about it, and I don't see a solution. There are some algorithms that can figure out the normal/inverted question in some cases, but these algorithms would be too slow to implement in a rendering program. And they are not (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Horse Progress Report
 
(...) Thanks. :) (...) Thanks for the hint, Steve. I'll give it a try. But if you're wrong, my daughter will not be too happy about you! :o) /Tore (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: '59 Caddy Hovercar Raytraces
 
this is quite cool, bram. i particularly like the use of pink elements and the bubble over the cockpit/driver's seat. it opens up a whole new range of possibilities (flying versions of classic cars). good stuff! ..joseph g (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.town, lugnet.cad.ray)
 
  Re: Is James' website finally gone for good?
 
(...) Tim, do you want to ask them, as the head honcho of ldraw.org content? Jacob, do you have a copy of James' site-files? I do, if you don't. Oops--I just checked, his site is back online. But maybe it makes sense to have a permanent mirror in (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)  


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR