 | | looking for 3425
|
|
Can it really be true that the 3425 hasn't been done? Regards John (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | new part - 71014 - castle greatsword - revised [DAT]
|
|
I updated this DAT file, incorporating all the suggestions that I received. Please LMKWYT. Thanks, Franklin 0 Castle Greatsword 0 Filename: 71014.DAT 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain (fwcain@yahoo.com) 0 Unofficial Element 0 0 CATEGORY Minifig Accessory 0 (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part : Minifig Torso with Patch Pocket Pattern
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Fs56r5.1Gu@lugnet.com... (...) The (...) that (...) than (...) I would say keep using the technique. Minifigs are most often viewed in models at a distance where they look better with the (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Cataloging Program
|
|
(...) This problem is why I chose PNG. It compresses flat shaded images quite well and still retains the true color pixels. My comprehensive testing of one sample image (the one on the LdGLite web page) put the PNG file at about half the size of the (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New part : Minifig Torso with Patch Pocket Pattern
|
|
(...) I noticed that too, but dismissed it as a rendering artifact, which I suppose it is. Do you think this means we should stop using this technique? The town torsos I have done without the hidden lines look bad in L3Lab at low mag - so I was (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Cataloging Program
|
|
(...) Is there some other way to compress JPG files, besides lowering the quality? Whenever I save a JPG file with 100% accuracy, the saved file is huge (ie, about the same size as a similar BMP file). (...) I've never heard of any kind of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Throwbot foot
|
|
(...) Marc, Fredrik's post prompted me to look more closely at this part. I noticed that there are references to any of the axle primitives. Is there a reason you did not use any of these primitive files in your file? Steve (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
(...) I was planning on making mine about 8 studs wide. I think that I can do it, even though I wasn't so sure earlier, but you reinspired me. I have been able to create doors that fold up, and don't look to bad, and wheels that fold down. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
Leonardo Zide <leonardo@centroin.com.br> wrote in message news:38DFDCB4.594866....com.br... (...) So what test do you run to determine what studs get removed? -John Van (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Throwbot foot
|
|
To me, the axle sticking out from the centre of the foot appears to have a little bit too thin cross sections. This observation is only based on viewing the part in L3Lab, so it may be wrong. What do you think? Other than that, it looks good! (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
