 | | Re: MPD spec
|
|
(...) OK! (...) Where is that documented ? Does it have parameters ? I personally, never heard about that Meta command ! Does a regular (extended) .DAT also suport this or is just an MPD specific meta command ? I think it's the later. [...SNIP. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 3736.dat Technic Large Pulley
|
|
Marc Klein <marckl@easynet.fr> wrote in message news:kdahcs8521umhu0...4ax.com... (...) is (...) in two seperate messages ? (...) I see. There are a couple ways of doing this that make it easier for others to view (and use) your parts. The first (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec
|
|
Steve: (...) Yes. I think that the right format for these alternative uses is gzipped tar files. There is Open Source code available for reading this format, and there is no need to go through a specification and implementation process. Play well, (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec
|
|
(...) I think part of the problem is that MPD files are currently being used differently than they were originally intended. Rui's ideas would benefit a lot of people trying to make use of MPD. But these changes would defeat current uses of the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
(...) Yes, definitely. What kind of commands do you add to the LDraw files? My concern would be how to hook up your stuff with the standard LDraw parts library, so we wouldn't have to maintain two separate sets of code. Steve (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
