 | | Re: New minifig-scale anthromorphic lifter/loader
|
|
(...) Definitely will. But I'm trying to decide if I want to add it to Her Majesty's Secret Death Squad (yawn) or if I want to start a new series, or if it's a stand-alone model. That, and I need to throw together a few props to go with it... (...) (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville a ghost-town?
|
|
thomas burger <tburger666@aol.com> wrote in message news:FqzMKK.HLo@lugnet.com... (...) keep (...) I put a _ton_ of work into Datsville this past fall, but began reaching technical limitations around December, and now I'm in the midst of our (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New minifig-scale anthromorphic lifter/loader
|
|
(...) looks pretty good, sproat. as always, you've got a knack for models that look simple on first glance but pack subtle, well-thought details. will this model appear on your page in the future or is it just a fun project? how about the podracer (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: ED-209 MOC
|
|
Dave Schuler <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:Fqsx3G.LrE@lugnet.com... (...) 15 (...) so (...) tip! (...) I took _way_ too long for such common sense to get through to me :-) -John Van (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Another question on part 30397
|
|
(...) Cool. We should probably have the length and part number confirmed by someone else, though, as I may very well remember incorrectly. LDS looks interesting. Should check it out some day, but I can't see that I'll find any time soon... Fredrik (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Another question on part 30397
|
|
Thank you, Fredrik, Here's the LDS source. It's also an example on how I use LDS: c=16 L=5 PRINT "0 Some kind of Technic Arm" L 0 Name: xxx.dat 0 Author: 0 Un-Official Part w=l*10 v=0-w 1 c v 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 arm3.dat arm3.dat c w 0 0 v=v+10 (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville contribution
|
|
Thomas: (...) Nice setup. The rumours about how fast Datsville can be rendered with one of the newer renderers seem to indicate a chance to continue the work on the project. Our main problem at the moment is that we need a machine with close to a Gb (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Another question on part 30397
|
|
(...) Yep! There's one in blue in 8462, e.g. I don't remember the length offhand, but I think it was 11 (between the centre of the holes). Perhaps someone else remembers the length and part number for this one? Fredrik (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec
|
|
(...) Generally, yes, but if you are viewing the DAT files on lugnet with a browser, the file name will be some long temporary name. -gyug (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec [DAT]
|
|
(...) I understand your proposal, but it has the bad side effect of requiring a double-pass through all the files. For example, if the first line of your file is: 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 foo.dat and foo.dat is not found in the search path, the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
