Subject:
|
Re: Grayscale Mosaics
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mosaic
|
Date:
|
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:28:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6485 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
Maybe -first of all- we need a good definition of “dithering”
|
I guess we do need a good definition. :) In this image:
The far left has NO dithering, the middle has the FS dithering (many programs do
this), and the right is mine.
| |
I think I understand your method: Instead of 5 colours, you
use 9 shades of gray.
|
(snip)
I use several different techniques but that is the heart of it. Looking high
and low I couldn’t find anyone else who had done that.
| |
the main disadvantage of this method is that you
will always need more 1x1 elements (the more 1x1 elements, the weaker your
finished mosaic will be).
|
(snip)
Having built a couple, I can tell you that they are surprisingly sturdy, much
more sturdy than similar sized mosaics I’ve made just made from 2xN bricks. I
do use a lot of 1x1 (which is very cost effective as they are about 1 cent each)
but then strengthen with 1x2 plates periodically. The mosaic itself is of
course 2 studs thick.
I’ll post a pick when I finally get one framed. :)
Corey
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Grayscale Mosaics
|
| (...) Maybe -first of all- we need a good definition of "dithering": Your left image shows no dithering at all. I see a similar conversion method as the one I used on the mosaic of (URL) my children>. I simply divide the total image in X fields of (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mosaic, FTX)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
