Subject:
|
Re: spitfire MOC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.military
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 22:24:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
400 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build.military, Drew Lawrence writes:
> I'm not sure what images you used as reference, but take a look at these:
>
> http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/BARC/images/seafire2.jpg
> http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/BARC/images/seafire1.jpg
> http://www.aviation-history.com/supermarine/spit-1a.jpg
> http://www.aviation-history.com/supermarine/spit3bld.jpg
> http://www.netcentral.co.uk/steveb/spitfire/s14.gif
> http://www.acm.cps.msu.edu/~kortasma/graphics/spitfire/l_bank.jpg
> http://www.acm.cps.msu.edu/~kortasma/graphics/spitfire/t_spixix.jpg
> http://www.acm.cps.msu.edu/~kortasma/graphics/spitfire/t_spitf5.jpg
>
> Granted, later variants of the Spitfire may have had the outward folding
> gear, but in all of the images I can find it features inward folding gear;
> exactly as you portrayed it.
you'v got me there. I checked out a number of the links you provided
(thanks!), and yes, indeed they all prove my MOC correct.
I guess I'll just have to post the reference I used.... or just forget about
it, since I appear to have done right by the plane in the first place.
Once again, thanks for the effort!
stuart
>
> One thing I've noticed that the inward folding landing gear is a common
> trait on American aircraft of the period, while outward folding gear seems
> common on German and British models.
>
> ~Drew
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: spitfire MOC
|
| (...) I'm not sure what images you used as reference, but take a look at these: (URL) later variants of the Spitfire may have had the outward folding gear, but in all of the images I can find it features inward folding gear; exactly as you portrayed (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
