Subject:
|
Re: spitfire MOC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.military
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 17:58:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
317 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build.military, Stuart Immonen writes:
> My son recently got interested in some war-era comics (!) and wanted some
> planes with which to dogfight. I complied with this:
>
> http://www10.ewebcity.com/dadoandrabbit/lego/spitfire.htm
>
> I know there are inaccuracies (the cockpit way too wide, the landing gear
> just a last minute add-on, and it could probably lose 2 studs in length),
> but it has good play value, and stands up to some abuse.
I'm not particularly familiar with the real Spitfire, but that's a great
plane model. Wonderful SNOT (Studs-Not-On-Top) usage!
--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: spitfire MOC
|
| (...) Well, there's lots of ref online, naturally, and the plane has undergone plenty of subtle changes over its years of service. Thanks for the kind words, though. It's actually remarkably sturdy for the amount of SNOT incorporated. stuart (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | spitfire MOC
|
| Hey people, My son recently got interested in some war-era comics (!) and wanted some planes with which to dogfight. I complied with this: (URL) know there are inaccuracies (the cockpit way too wide, the landing gear just a last minute add-on, and (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
