 | | Re: spitfire MOC —Drew Lawrence
|
| | | Arrrrr!!! Avast ye Brinkster, and prepare for boarding! Your evil Brinkster account has reached its daily bandwith limit. So I have to wait until tomorrow to see it. Just a suggestion, you should use BrickShelf.com. Its free, easy, and good for Lego (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: spitfire MOC —Stuart Immonen
|
| | | | (...) oh, for gosh' sake. I moved my other site from Brinkster for this same reason, and I've had it. I took your advice and here's where you can see the dope: (URL) for letting me know, though. Much appreciated. stuart (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: spitfire MOC —Drew Lawrence
|
| | | | (...) Ahhhh. Thats nice. I REALLY like how you put the plates on either side of the cockpit - that really gives the effect of the narrow Spitfire cockpit. Niiiice. Mad props, my friend. (pasted from a different part of the thread) (...) You got it (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: spitfire MOC —Stuart Immonen
|
| | | | In lugnet.build.military, Drew Lawrence writes: <snip> (...) thanks muchly! I appreciate you taking the time to re-visit. (...) Huh. Not according to the pics I saw (after the fact). They hinged just outside the wing guns, and folded in, not quite (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: spitfire MOC —Drew Lawrence
|
| | | | (...) I'm not sure what images you used as reference, but take a look at these: (URL) later variants of the Spitfire may have had the outward folding gear, but in all of the images I can find it features inward folding gear; exactly as you portrayed (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: spitfire MOC —Stuart Immonen
|
| | | | (...) you'v got me there. I checked out a number of the links you provided (thanks!), and yes, indeed they all prove my MOC correct. I guess I'll just have to post the reference I used.... or just forget about it, since I appear to have done right (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | |
