 | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles —Keith Goldman
|
| | | Director... In general, your vehicular designs are very cool. I liked the profile of the Flea, the gatling cannons & light array on the Scorp. I thought the Hyrdra's back half was outstanding, the tilting weapons system was spot-on, but the cab and (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles —Anthony Babington
|
| | | | "Keith Goldman" <legomankeith@aol.com> wrote in message news:HG78sx.1AsH@lugnet.com... (...) the profile of the Flea, the gatling cannons & light array on the Scorp. I thought the Hyrdra's back half was outstanding, the tilting weapons system was (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles —Andrew Summersgill
|
| | | | | (...) number (...) submarine. (...) an (...) to (...) Now this sounds like a really cool idea. Yes, you definitely need a map and I'd love to see it - would the towers be linked in some way with undersea access tunnels or something - to make it a (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles —Anthony Babington
|
| | | | | | "Andrew Summersgill" <ajs@nospamblahblahblah.co.uk> wrote in message news:HG89LI.22FC@lugnet.com... (...) Kelvinisgrad (...) see (...) a (...) and (...) surface. no direct connection between the towers, no. I'm going to design a cargo submarine (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles —Andrew Summersgill
|
| | | | | | (...) used (...) Why is that? Too comfy on the towers or just too dangerous? Andrew. (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles —Anthony Babington
|
| | | | | | "Andrew Summersgill" <ajs@nospamblahblahblah.co.uk> wrote in message news:HGC3FD.1236@lugnet.com... (...) closer to 1 than 2. the towers haven't actually seen any action yet. they hate the crew-change because it means they have to pack up whatever (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles —Andrew Summersgill
|
| | | | | | (...) of (...) of (...) Hmmm. Sounds like they need one of two things: 1) Deployable helicopter landing pad that can retract like a drawbridge from the side of the tower. OR: 2) Cage with some medicine in it for the gerbils. I guess it really boils (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles —Anthony Babington
|
| | | | | | "Andrew Summersgill" <ajs@nospamblahblahblah.co.uk> wrote in message news:HGDxvB.205x@lugnet.com... (...) they (...) they (...) exception (...) trio (...) that's actually a very good idea... *looks at his technic pieces* and feasible, too! (...) oh (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles —Joel Jacobsen
|
| | | | <snipped> (...) Anthony -- I really like this idea. Partly because I've always thought that the Principality of Sealand was a rather ambitious and creative idea based on a British line of defenses from WWII. (URL) your idea is more akin to the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles —Anthony Babington
|
| | | | (...) that the (...) a (...) Sealand.. but (...) weathered look (...) heh, everybody comments on the weathered look of my MOCs, I wish I could take credit for it... unfortuantely I can't, as it's just a side effect of having a lego collection almost (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles —Joel Jacobsen
|
| | | | (...) Heh yeah -- it's pretty odd. Ran across the site some years ago and have checked on it now and again. Without going too off topic, it's more the fact that one of the vacated towers was left standing for someone TO be able to claim. Kind of the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| | | | |
