Subject:
|
Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.military
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:24:37 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Andrew Summersgill <{ajs@blahblahblah.}SayNoToSpam{co.uk}>
|
Viewed:
|
638 times
|
| |
|
|
> no direct connection between the towers, no. I'm going to design a cargo
> submarine that would, in theory, dock with the towers underwater and be • used
> to transfer supplies and ammunition to them. crews come and go by
> helicopter, though (they all hate crew-change.)
Why is that? Too comfy on the towers or just too dangerous?
Andrew.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
| "Andrew Summersgill" <ajs@nospamblahblahblah.co.uk> wrote in message news:HGC3FD.1236@lugnet.com... (...) closer to 1 than 2. the towers haven't actually seen any action yet. they hate the crew-change because it means they have to pack up whatever (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
| "Andrew Summersgill" <ajs@nospamblahblahblah.co.uk> wrote in message news:HG89LI.22FC@lugnet.com... (...) Kelvinisgrad (...) see (...) a (...) and (...) surface. no direct connection between the towers, no. I'm going to design a cargo submarine (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
