 | | Re: Technic A-10 Warthog
|
|
(...) Ya know, that makes sense with respect to the gun. The way that the plane is designed, the rear landing gear are pretty far forward (in fact, I think they may be right smack in the middle) and with the engines hanging off the back, it's (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic A-10 Warthog
|
|
(...) Probably not. It would be completely impossible for me to Ldraw all the wiring, tubing, and flex cables. If the inspiration strikes me, I might be able to do part of it, though it's unlikely. Adrian (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic A-10 Warthog
|
|
(...) GAH!!! You can say that again. You struck a chord in my soul my friend. This here is my favorite bird. AWESOME JOB!!! A couple of notes for you though. Don't feel bad about it being aft heavy. The real thing keeps it ballenced by the GAU-80 (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic A-10 Warthog
|
|
"Adrian Drake" <tremor@apk.net> wrote in message news:GnLJCE.20G@lugnet.com... (...) That's a great model. Any chance of making the DATs or instructions available? Dan (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Technic A-10 Warthog
|
|
Hey gang, my latest creation is completed. With 3 technic motors, 1 micromotor, 3 fiberoptic banks, 4 large pneumatic cylinders, and 1 small pneumatic cylinder, this has a lot of nifty features. Check out the A-10 on the technic page. Thanks much (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.technic, lugnet.build.military) !!
|
| |
| | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
(...) Hello Tosiaki, I apologize for not responding sooner, but I did want to take a moment and welcome you! I've been a huge fan of your WWII models for quite a while, and I know I'm not alone. Your new Sherman is beautiful - I was particularly (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
Hi Masterbuilder Mr Tosiaki (...) Thank you for the dat-files. Your solution to the suspension / wheel arrangement for the Sherman tank is really clever and elegant. Now it is time to obtain more grey parts of the type 'Technic Connector Block 3 x 3 (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
Thank you for seeing Sherman! I am very glad as everybody was pleased. Since there were some requests, Reference pictures and dat files were registered into brickshelf. (URL) I have still begun MLCAD just, I am not used yet. However, I wish to reply (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
(...) Wow, that's beautiful! I like your ability to judge where the "pixellations" are OK and where they're not-- it looks splendid. One question: How did you get the bogie trucks to stay together? I wanted to do something like that for my Pz I but (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
(...) A very nice MOC of a Sherman. I thought the angles would be hard to capture, but you did a great job. Thanks, George (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Messerschmitt BF-109 "Emil"
|
|
(...) into the angled slope of the tail boom of the Emil. If you look at a couple of the real pictures, you'll note it extends straight from the cockpit, angling upwards from the bottom. On this note, has anybody else noticed that the hardest part (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | New Mecha, The Rf-79 Tiger
|
|
Hey'all! It's been awhile since I posted a new mecha, but here it is, the Byzantine Tiger, (yes it's the same one as in my story) I don't really like giving a explanation for my mecha anymore, but this one sort of begs it so here goes, My (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.announce, lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Messerschmitt BF-109 "Emil"
|
|
(...) Here's a quick mock-up of a fuselage cross I've been planning to put on my own Bf-109 in progress. It keeps the fuselage small, and rounded. Rather than have the tiles on top, one might even get away with 1x2 plates-with-center-stud, and a 1xn (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Messerschmitt BF-109 "Emil"
|
|
(...) The Star Wars canopy isn't entirely accurate. The BF 109's front windshield was a lot steeper then the SW canopy's is. I honestly don't think that, at this scale, a side-opening canopy is even possible. Fuselage crosses? I'd have to change the (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Messerschmitt BF-109 "Emil"
|
|
(...) the same way as the original, the shape is about right, which is very hard to do. Good idea to use that Star Wars canopy. I like the cross on the wings - but I challenge you to put one on the fuselage as well... (SNOT plates would do it, and (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Messerschmitt BF-109 "Emil"
|
|
For my next model, I chose the Messerschmitt BF-109 Emil. I have to give thanks to Shaun Sullivan and Gary Thomas; Sullivan for inspiring the use of screwdrivers as machine guns, and Thomas for inspiring the blended insignia. Thanks, you two! (now (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Vought F-4 Corsair
|
|
(...) <snipped really good history on US aircraft numbering schemes> Bill -- Thanks for the refresher on this. I knew about the AAC/USAF but had actually forgotten about the Navy's approach (and why.. well at least HOW.. will anyone ever understand (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
I see this (URL) I think "motorize it" (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Take Two - Heinkel He219 WWII German Nightfighter
|
|
(...) Thanks so much - I appreciate the comments. I'm actually redoing a few things (again...), but I think I'll put up a page somewhere (instead of just brickshelf) for this and some future project ideas. I'll post the info whenever I get (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Take Two - Heinkel He219 WWII German Nightfighter
|
|
(...) Thank you very much. The model is fairly front heavy (engines and all), so it balances very easily on the tricycle landing-gear. I did have to shift the side gear to towards the rear of the plane in order to balance properly. As for the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
