Subject:
|
Re: Messerschmitt BF-109 "Emil"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.military
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Nov 2001 01:02:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
315 times
|
| |
|
|
> Very clever fuselage construction. Although the canopy doesn't open
> the same way as the original, the shape is about right, which is very
> hard to do. Good idea to use that Star Wars canopy. I like the cross
> on the wings - but I challenge you to put one on the fuselage as
> well... (SNOT plates would do it, and it could cover the gaps as well)
>
> --Bill.
The Star Wars canopy isn't entirely accurate. The BF 109's front windshield
was a lot steeper then the SW canopy's is. I honestly don't think that, at
this scale, a side-opening canopy is even possible.
Fuselage crosses? I'd have to change the design of the crosses because at
their current dimensions (5 bumps in each direction) it would be too big to
fit on the fuselage. I could probably rip off Shaun's crosses though, and
make them 3x3.
Hmmmmmm.
`Drew
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Messerschmitt BF-109 "Emil"
|
| (...) Here's a quick mock-up of a fuselage cross I've been planning to put on my own Bf-109 in progress. It keeps the fuselage small, and rounded. Rather than have the tiles on top, one might even get away with 1x2 plates-with-center-stud, and a 1xn (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Messerschmitt BF-109 "Emil"
|
| (...) the same way as the original, the shape is about right, which is very hard to do. Good idea to use that Star Wars canopy. I like the cross on the wings - but I challenge you to put one on the fuselage as well... (SNOT plates would do it, and (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
