Subject:
|
Re: Quarterback Passing Efficiency?? -- Hear me out!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:46:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
768 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build.mecha, Mark Neumann wrote:
> Hmmm, yeah. Should be easy enough. Seems to me we create a series of look up tables, populate them with wieghts and keep a data dictionary handy for modification if needed. Then another table where mecha creations can be entereed with thier ratings and then a script to translate individual ratings into an overall "score." We need some webspace to make that happen though. I wonder if this would be a neat function to add to the LMHoF website. Maybe make it something fun to do with your mech while you visit?
I have some webspace that we can develop and test the initial software on.
I can't really imagine the initial server load would be too heavy.
Adding it to the LMHof is a great idea.
> I think this could be interesting. Another few factor to consider might be
> environment? Mech's "A" scores might be 22% Urban environment, 44%Jungle
> environment, 66%desert Environment and , 106%Moon Environment, for example.
Great point and noted. I have started to develop a system and I have added
environment to the list.
>
> As for ratings of weapons and the like, doesn't BrickWars have the functionality
> for that? We might be able to just leech off of that system insead of
> recreating our own. (sadly, I don't know much about Brickwars so I'd have to go
> read it out to find out myself)
First, I think that the majority of Mech are armed but I think the project
should look at two factors: functionality and weaponary. Each separately, then
someone like Eric could design a peaceful Mech and still have it rated.
>
> Joint type, should add "stud on brick" to reflect smaller creations like
> powersuits.
Agreed. A small Mech should be able to score just as high as a z40.
>
> Joint question. Often joints are made to look like they move but don't. What
> do those count as?
If you are thinking of Velociraptor, so was I. It is a good question. I don't
really have an answer yet.
>
> I think this is a fun idea. The real challenge will be to develop a system that
> correcly develops a score per what it aught to be. I mean, it'll all be
> pointless just for fun percentiles, but why not? Who else is game?
>
> Mark Neumann
Thanks Mark
Brian
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Quarterback Passing Efficiency?? -- Hear me out!!
|
| <snip> (...) Hmmm, yeah. Should be easy enough. Seems to me we create a series of look up tables, populate them with wieghts and keep a data dictionary handy for modification if needed. Then another table where mecha creations can be entereed with (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-05, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
