To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.contestsOpen lugnet.build.contests in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Contests / 384
383  |  385
Subject: 
Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.off-topic.fun
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:34:56 GMT
Viewed: 
1202 times
  
In lugnet.build.contests, Tony Hafner writes:
The wily competitor
will likely vote-split anyhow, not putting all the mandatory votes
in that category on the same entry.  They'll pick the ones they
think won't win and spread votes as evenly as possible across
those.

No, the wily competitor would mail a small pile of landing plates to me.
Then I'd favor his design with 20+ votes!

Though it is interesting to take your idea to its conclusion.  2 wily
competitors could end up causing the least likely entries to win.

--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com

This is an admirably baroque solution but I think the better one is just to
pitch the entries of non voters and go next best vote count entry wins.

Kyle's gets points for degree of difficulty, though... :-)

{"Well, Frank, that dive didn't come off too well. One of the judges got hit
with eggshell and the diver bellyflopped, splashing most of the water out of
the pool" "Yes, Howard, but the _Quadruple Backflip light a campstove and
Fry an Egg_ dive has the highest degree of difficulty of any dive attempted
in Olympic competition this year, by far, so our diver won anyway, Go USA!
Er, um, I mean, isn't it refreshing to see the Olympic ideals held up?")

++Lar



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
 
Can anyone tell me why these 5 people havn't posted their ballots? If they're not intrested in the outcome of the contest, why bother!?! Should lazyness be rewarded? Should the rest of us be kept waiting? Are we left here to suffer? (...) Ditch'em (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.contests)
  Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
 
(...) LOL!! :] KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
 
(...) No, the wily competitor would mail a small pile of landing plates to me. Then I'd favor his design with 20+ votes! Though it is interesting to take your idea to its conclusion. 2 wily competitors could end up causing the least likely entries (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.contests)

34 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR