| |
In lugnet.build.contests, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> 2. Suppose J. Fred Muggs entered and ends up not voting. Does everyone who
> voted for one of Mr. Muggs's entries have to revote?
No, the title would just go to the one with the next-highest number of vote-
points in that category.
> If so, we could get a
> domino, in that if one of THEM doesn't vote the second time, and gets DQed,
> we could have to have a THIRD round of votes and so on...
Ya, too messy.
> (remember, the rules say you have to spend all your votes or your entries
> are DQed... a vote for a DQed entry could be argued to be a non spent vote,
> and thus you haven't met your obligation to spend them all, or it could be
> argued that you met your duty in voting even if the entry was DQed through
> no fault of your own...)
That's what I had in mind, yes.
> I prefer the second option. Maybe the rules take care of this problem and I
> missed it, though...
It's not spelled out, unfortunately.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
34 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
