| |
In lugnet.build.contests, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> (remember, the rules say you have to spend all your votes or your entries
> are DQed... a vote for a DQed entry could be argued to be a non spent vote,
> and thus you haven't met your obligation to spend them all, or it could be
> argued that you met your duty in voting even if the entry was DQed through
> no fault of your own...)
>
> I prefer the second option. Maybe the rules take care of this problem and I
> missed it, though...
I don't think this was covered in the rules either. I say that if there are
disqualifications, we simply sack those entries and call winners from the
remaining pool. It's taken what-- 3 weeks from the end of the contest
already. I'm not interested in waiting another 3 weeks (or more!) before
calling it done.
We've already waited beyond what *I* think is reasonable. But I understand
that some people may be out of town. At this point, I don't really care- if
Todd wants to set an arbitrary deadline of a day or two or whatever, that's
fine by me.
--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
34 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
