To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.contestsOpen lugnet.build.contests in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Contests / 372
371  |  373
Subject: 
Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space
Date: 
Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:41:47 GMT
Viewed: 
1096 times
  
In lugnet.build.contests, Todd Lehman writes:
Almost all the votes are in, but I still haven't received ballots from the
following people:

  Jay Jacinto <manjingo@yahoo.com> (entry B2)
  Ashley Glennon <ashley.glennon@mindspring.com> (entries A3 & B7)
  Christopher Callahan <chriscal@microsoft.com> (entry C1)
  Mark Sandlin <sandlin@nwlink.com> (entry C1)
  Richard Marchetti <blueofnoon@aol.com> (entry K7)

If you are one of these people, and for some reason you never received a
ballot via e-mail, please write me ASAP!

I sent an email to Todd but on reflection I think that the questions I asked
ought to be publicly asked.

1. My MO as "auditor" was going to be to stash the ballots in a safe place
and not do anything more unless and until someone raises a question about
voting irregularities, at which point I would examine them closely to see if
I got the same ballots sent to me as Todd did, and the same results from
examining them as Todd did. Does anyone think I should be doing anything
differently?

Now would be a good time to speak up. (earlier would be better but I forgot
to ask earlier)... and no going to the Florida SC to get me DQed for not
asking earlier, either. :-)

Reminder:  Failure to vote disqualifies your entries.

2. Suppose J. Fred Muggs entered and ends up not voting. Does everyone who
voted for one of Mr. Muggs's entries have to revote? If so, we could get a
domino, in that if one of THEM doesn't vote the second time, and gets DQed,
we could have to have a THIRD round of votes and so on...

(remember, the rules say you have to spend all your votes or your entries
are DQed... a vote for a DQed entry could be argued to be a non spent vote,
and thus you haven't met your obligation to spend them all, or it could be
argued that you met your duty in voting even if the entry was DQed through
no fault of your own...)

I prefer the second option. Maybe the rules take care of this problem and I
missed it, though...

++Lar



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
 
(...) I don't think this was covered in the rules either. I say that if there are disqualifications, we simply sack those entries and call winners from the remaining pool. It's taken what-- 3 weeks from the end of the contest already. I'm not (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space)
  Re: Still missing ballots from 5 people
 
(...) No, the title would just go to the one with the next-highest number of vote- points in that category. (...) Ya, too messy. (...) That's what I had in mind, yes. (...) It's not spelled out, unfortunately. --Todd (24 years ago, 27-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Still missing ballots from 5 people
 
Almost all the votes are in, but I still haven't received ballots from the following people: Jay Jacinto <manjingo@yahoo.com> (entry B2) Ashley Glennon <ashley.glennon@mindspring.com> (entries A3 & B7) Christopher Callahan <chriscal@microsoft.com> (...) (24 years ago, 26-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space)

34 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR