| |
Chris, you have said some really good things, right on. Plus Bobby, you are
really taking this well, mostly everbody wants to give a little input, we
can all benifet from advice, but as you know you have to run with your
thoughts and only consider what we have said.
Of the People who have commented, I respect all they have said, I'm glad you
did'nt take it the wrong way. Size, Wieght and detail all play a roll in the
overall impact of the model. Fuctionallity also goes hand and hand with
these aspects too. I know from experience that building a good mech is a
game of give and take. I make consessions thru out the Robot depending on
what I want it to do or look like. Most of the time I end up somwhere in
between, but I never, never do less than I think I'm capable of....and in
the end I go by one of a couple motto's : keep them guessing!
Yada yada
Eric
In lugnet.build.mecha, Christopher Snead writes:
> In lugnet.build.mecha, Mladen Pejic writes:
> > Do you have some obsession with size?
>
> It seems from prevoius posts that size is a major concren for Bobby. However,
> I think this isn't neccessarily a bad thing. Trying to overcome issues of
> supporting large amounts of weight is a major factor in mech building.
> Although I don't share his desire to build mechs on that scale, I admire his
> attempt to push the envelope.
>
> > I'm sorry to say this...
> >
> > But I'm not really that inspired or amazed by your Gundam. I mean sure the • size
> > is huge, but what else is there.
>
> There is quite a bit. I'm impressed with his creative use of parts, probably
> do to the fact that he didn't have the resources to buy more Lego. I think
> that, in addition to size, he got the most out of his parts.
>
> > Sure, you might have reached the height benchmark, but you sure did sacrifice
> > looks, among other things such as movement of the limbs.
> >
> > To me, a good LEGO model is something that has a great design. The whole point
> > of building with LEGO is to make something that, well looks cool. I'm not
> > saying that your mecha isn't cool, I'm just saying that all you seem to care
> > about is reaching a certain height in your model. To me, a cool LEGO Gundam • can
> > be 10 cm tall, or 22 inches tall, as long as it looks good and is complete. • But
> > your Gundam is 4 feet tall, yet lacks certain things that make a Gundam a
> > Gundam (see above paragraph).
> >
> > Now I know I'll probably receive flames by posting this, and I know that you
> > can build whatever you want to build, but I'm just trying to give a little
> > constructive criticism.
>
> Well, I think that giving such criticism can be an important thing. To know
> what people like and dislike about one's mech can be valuable in the next
> project. I hope, Bobby, that you can take such criticism and use it as you see
> fit. If size is your objective, then please, by all means, continue to explore
> that aspect of building. You mentioned in a previous post that you would like
> to see others explore such scales. That may not be their thing; I know that I
> have no desire to build anything much larger than two feet. But it is your
> thing. You are the most qualified to build the mech of your dreams; it may not
> hapen tomorrow, and I know that you have concerns about not getting back to
> building. But Lego is great, because, in its infinite durability, will be
> there for you when you decide to get back into it. Like I said before, there
> is a lot to admire in your gundam.
>
> Christopher
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
