Subject:
|
Re: Minifig tools are Technic fig scale
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 17:00:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
939 times
|
| |
|
|
legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) writes:
> Think, think, think.... A-HA! I get it. I was hung-up on your term
> "suspenders". You mean the large Technic springs (or as I would call them,
> shock absorbers).
Duh, yes. Sorry for the confusion. Shock absorber seems like a much
better term.
> I used a 4595.dat Brick 1 x 2 x 2/3 with Studs on Sides between them so each
> "suspender" hole fit over a side stud on that part. So the stud in the hole
> holds it quite tightly.
I see. Personally, I don't like so much to put studs into axle holes,
as I feel that the studs are a little bit too wide, and may thus cause
wear in the ABS. But on the other hand, we're seeing this used more and
more in regular LEGO models.
I wonder, when was the first time LEGO used the "stud in axle hole"
concept? For some reason, I think that this was first used during the
recent years, but I have no documentation at all.
Fredrik
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Minifig tools are Technic fig scale
|
| (...) Think, think, think.... A-HA! I get it. I was hung-up on your term "suspenders". You mean the large Technic springs (or as I would call them, shock absorbers). I used a 4595.dat Brick 1 x 2 x 2/3 with Studs on Sides between them so each (...) (26 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.build)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
