Subject:
|
Re: Minifig scale?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:37:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
17409 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build, Richie Dulin wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
Hi all,
Of late I’ve noticed a resurgence in the use of ‘minifig scale’ as a term.
Being a mathematically inclined pedant I tend to take issue with this term
as minifigs are so deformed it strikes me as impossible to define a single
‘scale’ to them.
|
Indeed. I think the use of the term ‘minifig scale’ is just a turn of phrase.
|
Yes. I tend to think of ‘minifig scale’ as anything built to fit minifigs,
rather than an exact ratio. It’s all an approximation with lego.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Minifig scale?
|
| (...) My thoughts exactly. The problem with the minifig-scale question, is that the minifig is not scaled to a human, nor is the rest of his world, as presented by LEGO, scaled to human things. His/her cars are to small, tools are too big, houses (...) (16 years ago, 30-Jul-08, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Minifig scale?
|
| (...) Indeed. I think the use of the term 'minifig scale' is just a turn of phrase. (...) A striking silhouette indeed, though I wonder if your silhouette is representative of humanity. Hmmm... perhaps there are members of the community who are more (...) (16 years ago, 25-Jul-08, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
