To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.buildOpen lugnet.build in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / 16274
16273  |  16275
Subject: 
Re: 2006 sets
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.town, lugnet.build
Date: 
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:58:59 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
1779 times
  
In lugnet.town, Steven Asbury wrote:
   In lugnet.town, Paul Sinasohn wrote:
   In lugnet.market.shopping, Steven Asbury wrote:
  
Can we get both scale and a good building experience in the same set?

-Steven

Wouldn’t this be where the “creativity” comes in?

If I’ma kid, and I see how I can build a 4-wide plane, wouldn’t I recognize that a wider plane would be better, so I’ll look at all my parts and figure out how to make a wider plane? (plates & inverted slopes)

Yes, this presupposes that I have a large collection of pieces, but that’s a reasonable assumption for most kids...

So now I have to go build an 8-wide plane to show it can be done (1).

Paul Sinasohn

Agreed. But is there a point where the pieces are so large and so specialized that it loses the creativity? That plane nose reminds me more of Playmobil than an open-ended building toy.

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/tcsk/CITY2006/city7894.jpg

-Steven

I agree. When I saw these new planes I felt thoroughly disappointed and uninspired. My hunch is that they’re looking to put a 5+ age rating on the box. And if that’s the case, I can’t blame them for thinking they have to juniorize something. It’s just a shame the juniorization is so prominent.

When I bought the new 7239 fire truck I was amazed to see the 5+ on the box. Although the truck frame was juniorized it wasn’t so bad since it was mostly hidden. I feel they did a similarly good job hiding the juniorization pieces in the 7249 crane. Unfortunately the 7344 dump truck didn’t hide it as well, which is why I had no interest in purchasing it for myself (although I bought one for a 5 year old).

To hit their target market I don’t blame them for having to juniorize some things. I just wish they’d do it like 7239 and not like these new planes. With the 7239 truck frame it was as if to say:

“Well you could build this out of standard LEGO pieces but we’ll save you the trouble since you’re 5 years old and want to get on with playing with it.”

With these new planes it seems they’re saying:

“You could never build something that looks like this out of standard LEGO pieces so we’ll just sell you a plastic toy plane with a few studs on it so you can decorate it with LEGO pieces.”

The difference is subtle, but I think the effect on the inspiration it provides the child (or lack there of) will be significant.

Regards, Paul D.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 2006 sets
 
(...) Agreed. But is there a point where the pieces are so large and so specialized that it loses the creativity? That plane nose reminds me more of Playmobil than an open-ended building toy. (URL) -Steven (19 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.town, lugnet.build, FTX)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR