|
|
 | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) Deborah (and others) I made this offer awhile ago but had no takers - what the heck, I'll make it again here. If anyone has "wish list" parts they'd like to use in MLCAD but doesn't necessarily know how to author dat files, there's another way (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) Not at all. Well, maybe with my second guess on #13, but that's a matter of the evidence (i.e. the original mlcad plate that it was modified from) being flawed. For everything else I clearly thought just hard enough, since I pegged them all. (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) Whoops, meant to say "about 1/2-tile short of 2-brick height". (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) that was the point of the original post - entertainment. (...) much appreciated (...) again much appreciated (...) judgement is what human nature's all about. just content that someone looked at the pieces and got out of them what he/she (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) Well, if they made it in an 18 slope even though there's only one other basic compatible piece (I know there's also a triple-wedge, but...), there's always a chance that they might make it in 33 and 45 degree versions someday. (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) I'd say, given that you posted such a detailed analysis of all the parts, with a running point by point commentary, that you're the one thinking too hard, but that's just me. I think a better approach than analysing in depth is to just ask the (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) Yeah, it does clear up a few questions...though the description of part #17 looks a bit mixed up. As I said earlier, the part you based it on is 2x2x1, not 2x2x2, and you listed it as being "without center stud", when you showed it without the (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| In lugnet.dear-lego, Deborah Higdon wrote: Deborah, (...) I like your ideas. I would love to see wish #9 come to be real. My own wish is for a piece like this: (URL) very fancy, but it might be nice to have. :) Best regards, Allan B. (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) Ahhh, yes. You are correct. Bummer. That would be awesome in 33 degree. -Duane (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) Close, but not quite. I just got the Summer S@H catalog today, and the black faceted slopes used on that mech's waist are 18 degree slopes, but #22a has the proportions of a 33 degree slope. (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, FTX)
| |