 | | Re: wishin' on a star —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) or something that fits on top of a 1x1 tile, if the scale is unclear. (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: wishin' on a star —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) You're thinking too hard and not looking at all of the evidence. It's the only part in the entire list that's upside-down, so there must be something significant to the bottom. You can also see the stud on the top peeking out, which is way (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: wishin' on a star —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I'd say, given that you posted such a detailed analysis of all the parts, with a running point by point commentary, that you're the one thinking too hard, but that's just me. I think a better approach than analysing in depth is to just ask the (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: wishin' on a star —Deborah Higdon
|
| | | | | (...) that was the point of the original post - entertainment. (...) much appreciated (...) again much appreciated (...) judgement is what human nature's all about. just content that someone looked at the pieces and got out of them what he/she (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: wishin' on a star —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) Not at all. Well, maybe with my second guess on #13, but that's a matter of the evidence (i.e. the original mlcad plate that it was modified from) being flawed. For everything else I clearly thought just hard enough, since I pegged them all. (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| | | | |
