Subject:
|
Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build, lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 02:15:11 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@spamlessMATTDM.ORG
|
Viewed:
|
1231 times
|
| |
|
|
[adding .geek]
Purple Dave <purpledave@maskofdestiny.com> wrote:
> ratio. I have been unable to find any evidence that the actual physical
> dimensions are known, beyond one person's claim that the physical
> Cinerama screen (which has an innacurate ratio of approx 4x10.79) is
> actually the first of three Monoliths seen in the movie. Without getting
> Clarke to state it outright, movie footage of the lunar Monolith is
> probably the best source for Monolith-to-human ratio.
It's been a while since I read these books, but doesn't their physical
*size change*?
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
|
| (...) ...which is the minimum size required to achieve the 1x4x9 dimensional ratio. I have been unable to find any evidence that the actual physical dimensions are known, beyond one person's claim that the physical Cinerama screen (which has an (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.build)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
