To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.buildOpen lugnet.build in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / 14481
14480  |  14482
Subject: 
Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build
Date: 
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 03:42:38 GMT
Viewed: 
688 times
  
In lugnet.build, Matthew Jeffery wrote:
   snip
  
   I think it would be easier to just use technic bricks (inside the construct, they would be completely concealed by smooth bricks on the surface, and mounting bricks at 90 degree angles so as to get the bricks building with the studs facing both up and down. Of course, using such a construct would mean that it couldn’t be just 2 studs wide anymore because there wouldn’t be enough room inside...

There are two major problems with that. The first is that you’d have pins marring the smooth surface on at least one side. The second is that you’ll have a gap of approximately 3/64” between the two sections on each face.

I am of the belief that you guys are nuts! :) (No offence intended) the simplest solution, as far as I can work out, is to build it for the most part studs up, and use some 2 stud long technic axles inside the inner tubes of the brick, both ways:



Axles need to be of the older, non-notched variety, as they have more grip on the inside of a tube.

  
   You *MIGHT* be able to build it with only 4 studs wide, but I think it would need to be at least 6 studs wide (with all other dimensions proportionately increased) in order to be large enough to conceal a working and sturdy brick reversing mechanism by at least one stud thickness of smooth bricks for the outside of the monolith.

not really required :)

   As I mentioned in a previous post, it is entirely possible to build one that’s five plates thick by 8 bricks wide by 18 bricks long, with tiles covering the two largest faces, which keeps it at the exact same dimensions as the 2x8x15 vertical construction. I’ve already figured out a SNOT method that would make it work, but I’d need a lot more black tiles than I own...and the end result might be a touch on the fragile side (it’d help greatly if it could be built one plate thicker).

Too complicated, if anyone had asked me :)

I have built the monolith in the 2x8x15 format now - deep links:

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/epsilon/Monolith-from-2001/monolith00.jpg

   http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/epsilon/Monolith-from-2001/monolith04.jpg

and the gallery (post moderation)

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/epsilon/Monolith-from-2001/monolith05.jpg

Oops - fixed now - here’s the real link

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=70180

Cheers, Matt

“Make it so”



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
 
<snip> (...) I am of the belief that you guys are nuts! :) (No offence intended) the simplest solution, as far as I can work out, is to build it for the most part studs up, and use some 2 stud long technic axles inside the inner tubes of the brick, (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)

20 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR