Subject:
|
Some clarification
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:33:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1038 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim David wrote:
> I wouldn't worry about not being the first although I know that it is annoying.
> Looking at your two designs it is amazing that they are so different inside to
> acheive the same action. Your rings obviously give a smoother (more engineered?)
> motion but the shapes of Mark's corner peices are a very clever way around it.
I... uh... wasn't the creator of that.
According to the LUGNET post, the credit appears to go to Martin Howard.
I just happened to remember reading it not too long ago and a quick
search on the LUGNET archives turned up the particular thread.
>> Mark
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Some clarification
|
| (...) Sorry, my mistake, wasn't concentrating hard enough I guess Must be something about being called Martin/Maarten that makes you build cubes! Tim (21 years ago, 17-Nov-03, to lugnet.build)
| | | Re: Some clarification
|
| (...) Yes that's right. I've just logged on to Lugnet for the first time in a while and *another* Rubiks cube is in the headlines - fantastic. Martin P.S. instructions for my cube a re now available at (URL) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.build)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO Rubik Cube
|
| (...) I wouldn't worry about not being the first although I know that it is annoying. Looking at your two designs it is amazing that they are so different inside to acheive the same action. Your rings obviously give a smoother (more engineered?) (...) (21 years ago, 14-Nov-03, to lugnet.build)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
