|
|
 | | Re: legos biggest mistake is...
|
| (...) real (...) girls (...) been (...) Perhaps the term "overtly sexy" has too much cultural (or personal) bias. In this case I'm refering to the plunging necklines or overdeveloped chests some of the "babe / wench" figures display. Specifically (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.minifigs)
| | | | | Re: Multi-story buildings - story height
|
| (...) Thanks for the input, everyone. I definitely seems that 6-7 is the norm, officially and unofficially. Unfortunately, that means I have to some serious thinking about my original plan, which was 9-10. I was just using 10 (including floor (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | Dragon arm variation
|
| As many of you know, the dragon's arms don't offer much flexibility. Well, I set out to fix that problem. Playing around with some miscellaneous pieces, I have designed arms that are far more useful than the originals. They can move up and down, (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | RE: legos biggest mistake is...
|
| Fair enough...In my 1978 Australian full range catalogue, space isn't shown at all, while in my instructions: 885,886,889,897 the (c) year in 1979, and in my partial catalogue [which from referring to other catalogues, I've dated to 1979] it shows (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.minifigs)
| | | | | Re: legos biggest mistake is...
|
| (...) Looks like it was '78 in the US. At least according to the Lugnet/Pause database. (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.minifigs)
| | | | | Re: legos biggest mistake is...
|
| (...) <snip> Personally, I always thought of Barbie as having too long legs w/relation to her head, not the other way around. (Then again, Barbie is SO totally skewed that it's hard to tell. ;-) -Shiri XFUT .o-t.fun (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: legos biggest mistake is...
|
| (...) Ah... I missed that one. Still, the same thing applies -- there's proto-minifigs as far back as 1975.... (...) :) Wow. I just barely pre-date the proto-minifig. Wow, this discussion was dangerous -- I just remembered that I love the little (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.minifigs)
| | | | | RE: legos biggest mistake is...
|
| (...) The minifig as we know it was a descendant of the 'stiffs' from 1975 [1](?). In 1978, 'Legoland' was created which was both the begining of town and of Castle as we know them. The minifig was also used with the maxifigs as both a baby, and as (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.minifigs)
| | | | | Re: legos biggest mistake is...
|
| (...) Act'lly... (URL) the proto-minifig, as Todd and/or Suz commented below. (...) Well... maybe... Dave, tho', might've just gotten one of the baby-minifig sets before the Classic Space sets, so that would explain why he saw them first. -Shiri The (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.minifigs)
| | | | | Re: legos biggest mistake is...
|
| (...) at (URL)) But, do those sets from 1979 really predate the space sets from 1978? I do see a minifig-as-baby in <set:208>, also from 1978, but there's no examples of either before that. My conclusion is that the minifig was developed to be a (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.minifigs)
|
|
