 | | Re: lego MOC: posable female figure
|
|
Humina, humina... @8^) Great construction, Dave. Those poses are something else. Especially the too-hot-for-brickshelf spread eagle shot: (URL) gotta go lie down. -Rev. Smith (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: New Female Mecha
|
|
Thanks! I'll go back and study the pictures again with your words this time :) /Tobbe (...) /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mecha & LDraw Files
|
|
(...) Geordan Hankinson: Thanks! (...) I will! (...) I know what you mean, but if the MOC is of the same quality as yours the more the merrier! I did not like I had to take a lunch brake in my look-session though :) (...) You're welcome :) But I'm (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: lego MOC: posable female figure
|
|
David, That is a most EXCELLENT female figure! There's a problem with the links though. There are a couple of backslashes in the URL's that should be forward slashes. (The last 2 in each URL) When you click on it, you get an error message. I just (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: New Female Mecha
|
|
(...) This is awsome! You are a true inspiration for all Evangelion builders! Keep it up! Bobby (NOM) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: lego MOC: posable female figure
|
|
ooh la la, I think some cad renderings or an animation are in order(if you have the time) chris (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mecha & LDraw Files
|
|
(...) Heh. Ah dang, okay, I'll work on that. ;-) (...) Thanks. (...) Yeah, maybe having them the other way around would look good on this mecha too. (...) Again, yeah, I could have made it larger. It's one of those anime mecha style issues. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mecha & LDraw Files
|
|
Gad Mladen, well done. (what else can be said really, you rock on this one.) But one criticism, don't you think you got too many studs showing??? lol Chain guns at the hips: way cool, remind me of something off an Apache. Missle racks: big and beefy (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Town Building Contest: voter registration now open
|
|
(...) You got most of the buildings that I noticed were in the wrong category, but the Municipal Garage (E009) might still be in the wrong one... I'm not sure. The main part of the building is under 32, but if the attached office and all the other (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build.contests)
|
| |
| | Re: lego MOC: posable female figure
|
|
Wow! The variety of poses you can reach is amazing. I think the legs are a little out of proportion to the rest, but that's my only complaint. Bruce (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Lego Going Downhill?
|
|
(...) Generally speaking, I think Lego is making a big comeback. But they are also making a wider range of products. You don't like Jack Stone? Bionicle? Fine- spend your money on a Metroliner or Blacksmith's Shop. Spend it on Star Wars. Spend it on (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: lego MOC: posable female figure
|
|
(...) are very "human-like" too. Did you get someone to pose & then copy the pose to the figure? BTW, the page doesn't work in Netscape 4.6 - the sub-directory slashes in your <MAP> sections are the wrong way round. ROSCO (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Lego Going Downhill?
|
|
(...) That statement is right up there with: "If man were meant to fly, he'd have been born with wings." I think you are being very short-sighted here. IMO LEGO is just finally starting to reach its potential (the Golden Age of LEGO is *NOW*) Sure, (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: lego MOC: posable female figure
|
|
(...) Excellent work! I would never have thought such flexibility/posability was possible. Cheers Richie Dulin (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Lego Going Downhill?
|
|
(...) I keep all my thoughts on the current situation right here: (URL) for the lack of new themes? This is a good thing. Part of the recent problems has been the incredible deluge of themes. At one time in the last year, the LEGO site listed no (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Gla Gla's Patlabor
|
|
(...) ALPHONSE!!! That's Noa piloting him. WOW!!! This is the most exciting mech I have seen in a while. Mostly because Patlabor is my favorite anime. And this labor is so well constructed. Jude This made my day. 8^) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | lego MOC: posable female figure
|
|
I originally posted the link to my latest MOC in build.mecha, but since it's not strictly speaking, a mecha, I thought I'd let some non-mecha-heads see it, and post here. The model is a 20" tall posable female figure built using building techniques (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Gla Gla's Patlabor
|
|
Boy am I a slowpoke... [nah, just extremely busy] Where to begin... WOW! Patlabor is my favourite anime of all time, and Gla Gla certainly did justice to the beautiful Ingram design found in the shows and the two movies. Dang... He even managed to (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mecha & LDraw Files
|
|
(...) Well you can thank Geordan Hankinson for that; he directed me to it. I can direct to other cool ones if you want, just e-mail me. ;-) (...) Thanks Tobbe. (...) What the he... Someone actually bothered to look that far?!?!?! [Joking... I always (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mecha & LDraw Files
|
|
(...) Heh. (...) LOL! Yeah, right... ;-D (...) Hahaha! Lincoln Log! Hmmm... I suppose it does. :-) (...) Thankya Stuart! (...) Let's see: 4 studs on sides of head 2 on connection point to head 2 on chest 4 on back of torso 8 total for forearms 4 (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
