To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.ambassadorsOpen lugnet.ambassadors in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Ambassadors / 304
303  |  305
Subject: 
Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.ambassadors
Date: 
Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:31:31 GMT
Viewed: 
10770 times
  
In lugnet.ambassadors, Nelson Yrizarry wrote:
   Recent events have put the issue of image hosting in the spotlight. There are a lot of choices out there, from popular sites like Brickshelf and MOCpages to newer sites like MOCShow, YouBrick, BrickImage, and even commercial, non-LEGO sites like Flickr. All of these sites provide an invaluable service to the LEGO fan community - a place to host your images.


The LEGO Ambassadors would like to ask you for your input on what you would want from an image-hosting site:
  • What would make for the “ideal” image-hosting site for LEGO fans?

  • What type of features/services would you like to see on such a site?

  • How much would you be willing to pay for these services, if free image hosting was not an option?


Note: This post is not intended to start a debate about which existing image hosting website is better. As fellow LEGO fans, we just want to ask you for your thoughts and ideas regarding the viewing and showcasing of your LEGO creations. These ideas will not be forwarded to The LEGO Group, who have publicly and clearly stated that they will not own, nor run such a service. Your comments will be available here for others in the community to view - and hopefully utilize - in building and improving image hosting sites for all LEGO fans.


Nelson Yrizarry


I’d like to see support for pictures as well as LDRAW and Track Designer Files.

Automatic reduction and file size optimisation, or just an outright ban on people uploading large pictures or BMP formats.

Thumbnailing for galleries.

Mid-size images (like Flickr) are good, but viewing either them or the full image should be optional, and you shouldn’t have to go through loads of clicks to get to what you prefer.

Simple captioning of images.

Basic hierarchy and group structure for galleries.

Ability to move galleries/folders around the hierarchy, but preserve the reference URLs of the gallery and images within it.

Search facility to find or exclude keywords. Limit on keywords attached to images/galleries to prevent spamming.

Simple page structure and interface. No using hundreds of server calls to create just a single page, as it’s awful when the latency is low even on a fast connection (this is except where you have no choice, such as a page of thumbnail images).

And if the only option is to pay for it then I’ll just host my own instead.

Jason R



Message is in Reply To:
  Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
 
Recent events have put the issue of image hosting in the spotlight. There are a lot of choices out there, from popular sites like Brickshelf and MOCpages to newer sites like MOCShow, YouBrick, BrickImage, and even commercial, non-LEGO sites like (...) (17 years ago, 4-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce, FTX) ! 

23 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR