 | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —James Brown
|
| | | (...) Yup, I agree. I was mostly speaking to the .theme groups, I suppose. They are more inherently discussion - the .loc groups are a different mammal, in several ways. (...) Well, ok. I've noted which groups I feel are appropriate below... (...) (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) "I desperately need a few 2x4x3 flibber-globbits (any color) for spaceship I'm working on. If you've got some, check out my post in .market.bst." Ok in .space? (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) I can only speak for myself here, I'd find that extremely annoying, if that's all the post said -- especially without a more explicit pointer to the other list. Yet, even with a more explicit pointer, it wouldn't sound any different to me as a (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) spaceship (...) that's (...) other (...) different (...) Gotta agree with Todd here, but a counter example which is probably ok is something like the following: : Check out (URL) for pictures of the huge (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | I'm posting from tree view so just picked one to hang my post on. First let me say that Frank's proposed guidelines/rules are better this iteration than ever, he's really getting good at it! (...) I think this one is... and I'll tell you why. A (...) (25 years ago, 16-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
