Subject:
|
Re: Advertising on lugnet
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:37:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7536 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> In lugnet.admin.terms, John Barnes writes:
> > I note that the same lugnet user is again advertising in lugnet.robotics;
> >
> > http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/?n=19376
> >
> > Since no action has obviously been taken since this person last advertised
> > in this news group a few weeks ago, am I to take it that this group is now
> > available for advertising? I have a whole boatload of products I could
> > announce :)
>
> It's not my place to say for sure, but I don't think so.
>
> I know Suz is very busy right now (weddings and their aftermath tend to do
> that) and may just not have had a chance to fire off a note. As I said in my
> last reply, I think perhaps someone else could speak up, gently, and see if
> the problem could be resolved. I'd do it but I have no standing in the
> robotics group.
>
> It WOULD be good if the charter (of a gatewayed group) was clarified on what
> is and isn't OK with gatewayed groups.
>
> I hope that helps. Not sure it does though.
It might also help to initiate discussion within the group. .robotics is
effectively an external group, and to some extent should set it's own
charter (of course if it sets a direction which is incompatible with
Lugnet then it might be time to separate the two). I wonder how many
subscribers really realize they are part of Lugnet?
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Advertising on lugnet
|
| (...) It's not my place to say for sure, but I don't think so. I know Suz is very busy right now (weddings and their aftermath tend to do that) and may just not have had a chance to fire off a note. As I said in my last reply, I think perhaps (...) (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
