 | | Re: whoop de doo
|
|
(...) If it helps you figure it out any, I think Alan was trying out the technique mentioned in this post: (URL) -- to an excessive extent! (Note that Alan's post 1520 was 3 minutes before the string of 108 messages started.) (24 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: whoop de doo
|
|
(...) :) thanks (...) If it were thousands, I sure would. I'd probably ask you first, even. :) But I can definitely see the possibility of someone not even thinking twice about posting several dozen short messages to a .test group. In between (...) (24 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: whoop de doo
|
|
(...) Ahh, but you're special. No doubts in my mind that if you or DanB or JeremyS (for example) had done it, you'd've had a good solid reason. And if you weren't just bored and playing around, I'll bet you'd mention ahead of time that you were (...) (24 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: whoop de doo
|
|
(...) Step 1 is to disable his posting ability to that group ASAP -- nobody needs to post 108 messages -- many all the same exact copy -- to test any of those things shown above. If it turns out later that Alan had a legitimate reason to do what he (...) (24 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Podracing bucket contents revealed . . .
|
|
(...) Ewwww... (...) No, but it is a Fight Club!!! Now where's Brad Pitt, I want to bash his face in! ;-) ~Nathan (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Podracing bucket contents revealed . . .
|
|
In the end, this is all moot. I'm keeping the pics to myself, and should have never brought it up. As a webmaster of sorts, it's very easy to jump out and say "look what I've got!" I should have gone to LEGO and asked, like I am doing now. If LEGO (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Podracing bucket contents revealed . . .
|
|
(...) The reasoning is simple: The LUGNET Terms of Use Agreement (URL) anyone to post information which infringes upon the privacy or publicity rights of others. If you ask LEGO, I think you'll find that they view any and all "leaks" as unauthorized (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can you say *** on Lugnet?
|
|
(...) If it isn't anonymous (ie - LUGNET reads the posting cookie, or the person submitting the problem post has some other form of identification), and only one mail is sent per problem post.. then I agree. Or rather, just something to stop someone (...) (25 years ago, 19-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: figuring out prices
|
|
(...) heheh... no wonder I couldn't find it before... Thanks for creating it! :) Dan (25 years ago, 19-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: figuring out prices
|
|
(...) lugnet.market.appraisal --Todd (25 years ago, 19-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
