To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / *320 (-5)
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) Kyle, You might want to check on your newsreader program...it seems to be holding messages you meant to post when the thread was fresh! ;?P Seriously though, Todd is working on stuff...that's as good as it can get, except for fighting the good (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) [snipped lots more] I think the problem here is that no fraud or theft has been committed (note IANAL!). The other regs you quoted implied a similar requirement. *However*, if paid membership were a requirement for posting, and the identity (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
In further addendum to my previous two posts, it has been requested that the relevant codes of law as pertain to identity theft be cited, and referenced on the Federal Trade Commission's web site. I have taken my own personal time to research and (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) Specifically, an individual who has been banned for Violations of the TOS, and who continues to post under "stolen" identities. (...) This (violating the communities rules) is excactly why this individual's posting privileges were revoked in (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) I don't know what the "blatant identity thefts" were, but: Do the feds _really_ want to hear about usenet posts with spoofed IDs? Not judging by the site that you linked to. Please point out the relevant part that I missed. A little more (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR