Subject:
|
Re: Marking articles as 'read'
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 Apr 2002 01:40:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1240 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ross Crawford writes:
> You've said you wouldn't find it useful, and that's fine. One datapoint. But
> just saying "I don't think this is useful to me" is insufficient, IMHO, as
> an argument against, just as "I think this is useful to me" is insufficient,
> by itself, as an argument for.
In fact, it appears I've changed my mind yet again
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/nntp/?n=850 8?)
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Marking articles as 'read'
|
| In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ross Crawford writes: <snip> I think I've shown already where Todd said that the code change would not be "large" to do this. (but *any* code change is large, some just are larger). The data structure already exists. (...) (22 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
