Subject:
|
Re: Legends Newsgroup
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jun 2002 22:27:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
918 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Bruce Hietbrink writes:
> On the one hand, if the policy is a newsgroup for each theme,
FYI, there is no such policy.
Planning of the compartmentalized-dork kind is more of an art than a
science. Many factors are taken into consideration. After that, there's a
"gut feeling" yea or nay. Then there's some continued observation.
> (and this is presumably why there is a Galidor group).
Do you feel that group is not needed? (curious)
I figure the new line may draw a slightly "different crowd" here, who'll be
new, and unsure where to post. Plus, IMHO, the Galidor product is outside
the realm of "normal LEGO."
> maybe there should be one for Legends
I don't see a need for it. But I will keep an eye on the possibility.
> On the other hand, I'd agree with Jude. Legends aren't
> really a distinct theme, but just a marketing category for the release of
> sets from other themes.
I agree. I hope people post about Legends in whatever group fits the
context. Like, if you have some Legend 'issue' to discuss with LEGO Direct,
or something to say about the line itself, post there. If you have fantasies
to relate or anger to vent (or whatever), use Dear-LEGO. If you want to
discuss a particular model or theme, use its group. And if you're just
generally chatting, I think it's fine to use General. When in doubt, use
General.
-Suz
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Legends Newsgroup
|
| (...) However, I feel the need for a centeralized location for Legends-related opinions and news. I don't want to have to check lugnet.castle, lugnet.pirates, lugnet.space, and a slew of other newsgroups in the pitiful hope that I will find between (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | Re: Legends Newsgroup
|
| (...) Oh, my bad. I thought there was because in a recent discussion (on making a monsters or studios group) someone suggested getting rid of some of the low-traffic groups (I believe they specifically mentioned .underground) and someone else (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | Re: Legends Newsgroup
|
| (...) Dear Suz, its june 19th, and found this thread (dated june 2) just 2 minutes ago. it was on the second page (no summary setting), the search contained "new legend". i have been searching for legend threads since they came out with the first (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Legends Newsgroup
|
| On the one hand, if the policy is a newsgroup for each theme, then maybe there should be one for Legends (and this is presumably why there is a Galidor group). On the other hand, I'd agree with Jude. Legends aren't really a distinct theme, but just (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
